HealthWavy Smart Health Tools for Everyday Wellness

Everyday Wellness · Measured ventilation

CO₂ Decay Ventilation Analyzer

Estimate air changes from measured carbon-dioxide decline over time.

MODEL WORKSPACE

Your measured ventilation inputs

Requires a controlled, approximately well-mixed decay period with no continuing source and a stable measured background.

Use an unoccupied decay period with no continuing CO₂ source, at least three increasing time points.

Example values are shown. Change them to calculate your result.

YOUR RESULT

Measured ventilation report

3 ACH · fitted decay estimate

Unoccupied, well-mixed single-zone assumption

Equivalent flow150 m³/hour
Log-fit R²1
Log residual RMS2.5786e-9
Samples3
Full result table
Calculated from the current values, with rounded display.
Elapsed minCO₂ ppmAbove background ppmln excessFit ln excessLog residual
01,4201,0006.9077556.9077551.8234e-9
15892.36655472.366556.1577556.157755-3.6467e-9
30643.13016223.130165.4077555.4077551.8234e-9

Requires a controlled, approximately well-mixed decay period with no continuing source and a stable measured background. Sensor quality and mixing affect the result. A high fit statistic does not certify adequate ventilation or establish infection risk.

HEALTHWAVY AI

Let’s work it out.

Ask about this tool, enter your values, or understand your result.

Ask in your own language.

GET STARTED

How to use CO₂ Decay Ventilation Analyzer

  1. Estimate air changes from measured carbon-dioxide decline over time.
  2. The logarithm uses measured CO₂ minus the background.
  3. Ordinary least squares fits the logarithmic excess concentration.

Worked example

For C(t) = 420 + 1000 exp(−0.05t), the fitted slope is −0.05 per minute and estimated ACH is three per hour.

Formula, accuracy & limitations

Fit ln(C(t) − background) = intercept + slope × minutes by ordinary least squares. ACH = −60 × slope. Outdoor-air flow estimate(m³/hour) = ACH × room volume. R² describes agreement with the exponential-decay assumption.

Requires a controlled, approximately well-mixed decay period with no continuing source and a stable measured background. Sensor quality and mixing affect the result. A high fit statistic does not certify adequate ventilation or establish infection risk.

The primary result is rounded to two decimal places. Calculation tables show up to four and supporting metrics up to six. Very small nonzero values use scientific notation. Display rounding is not fed back into the arithmetic.

Official source and method context ↗

Use a real decay experiment

Estimate air changes from measured carbon-dioxide decline over time. Record a stable background and at least three increasing elapsed times during an approximately unoccupied period. A busy room with changing occupants or continued combustion does not match this simple decay model.

Check every reading against the background

The logarithm uses measured CO₂ minus the background. Values at or below that background cannot be used by this fit and are rejected rather than clamped to a small positive number. A wrongly assumed background can alter the slope even when the plotted decline looks smooth.

Inspect the fitted curve and residuals

Ordinary least squares fits the logarithmic excess concentration. The result includes a slope, R² and an observed-versus-modelled table. The fitted slope must represent decay. Fit quality describes this dataset’s consistency with the assumed curve; it does not prove that the room was well mixed or the sensor calibrated.

Avoid converting ACH into a personal risk score

Multiplying estimated ACH by room volume gives a flow estimate under the model. It cannot identify every air pathway, certify code compliance or calculate a person’s infection probability. Use the measurement context and professional ventilation assessment when those decisions matter.

QUICK ANSWERS

Frequently asked questions

Can I use CO₂ readings from an occupied meeting?

A continuing source violates the simple decay assumption. Use an appropriate controlled decay period instead.

Why must background be measured?

The fitted logarithm depends on excess concentration above that background, so an incorrect baseline changes the estimate.

Does R² close to one prove accuracy?

It indicates a close curve fit, not correct sensors, mixing or experimental conditions.

Is filtered-air CADR included?

Particle filtration does not remove CO₂ in the same way, so its CADR is not inferred from this experiment.